I commented that I agreed with every word in the post above.  Not this one.  Why do you think it doesn't make much sense for tax fairness etc ?  It makes a whole lot of sense to me.  
I sense a centrist reflex -- like Obama you feel the need to agree in part with the view you  go on to reject.  You also love to set up straw men.  I think  that the trick of ascribing "overriding" to some in your party fails twice.  First, since you couldn't  identify any such person (until I volunteered in the first paragraph of this commen) the rhetorical trick is obvious.  Second, "overriding"  isn't an extreme enough word to serve your rhetorical purpose.  This is a key issue on which a solid majority absolutely rejects the Republican's overriding priority.  
Can you come up with a hint of a shred of an argument for your view that it should't become an overriding issue for Democrats ?
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment